<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<reviews itemIdentifier="ryanadams2006-10-09.mbho.flac16"><review><reviewbody>is this track missing or was it not actually played?</reviewbody>
<reviewtitle>29?</reviewtitle>
<stars>5</stars>
<reviewer>Dan33185</reviewer>
<createdate>2006-10-10 23:17:04</createdate>
<reviewdate>2006-10-10 23:17:04</reviewdate>
</review>
<review><reviewbody>Still can&#039;t believe I&#039;m listening yo a show less
than 24 hours old, a Hot one at that, seems to me that Ryan could become the Dead for a new
generation.</reviewbody>
<reviewtitle>germany gets a great one</reviewtitle>
<stars>5</stars>
<reviewer>austin nyc</reviewer>
<createdate>2006-10-11 00:21:29</createdate>
<reviewdate>2006-10-11 00:21:29</reviewdate>
</review>
<review><reviewbody>...but for some it isn&#039;t streaming and it&#039;s not listed either. If you download via ftp, it is there. I&#039;ll see if I can fix this.</reviewbody>
<reviewtitle>29 is not missing...</reviewtitle>
<stars>5</stars>
<reviewer>moon-pix</reviewer>
<createdate>2006-10-11 06:55:43</createdate>
<reviewdate>2006-10-11 06:55:43</reviewdate>
</review>
<review><reviewbody>Thank you Christian for this great show! 
Blue Sky Blues :-)
See you in Lu.....</reviewbody>
<reviewtitle>Thank you</reviewtitle>
<stars>5</stars>
<reviewer>tomtom69</reviewer>
<createdate>2006-10-11 11:11:30</createdate>
<reviewdate>2006-10-11 11:11:30</reviewdate>
</review>
<review><reviewbody>This was the show weÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂ´ve been waiting for in Hamburg for 4 and a half years .Our wishes were fullfilled as you can also see in these  press reviews.

Hamburger Morgenpost:&quot;sehr, sehr gut&quot; [very, very good], Hamburger Abendblatt: &quot;Sternstunde&quot; [magic moment], Die Welt:&quot;toll&quot; [amazing 

for more info see: 
http://www.mopo.de/2006/20061011/hamburg/kultur/der_wunderbare_ryan_adams.html
http://www.abendblatt.de/daten/2006/10/11/622967.html
http://www.welt.de/data/2006/10/11/1066487.html</reviewbody>
<reviewtitle>Hamburg Newspapers on this show</reviewtitle>
<stars>5</stars>
<reviewer>luckyluuk</reviewer>
<createdate>2006-10-11 21:28:09</createdate>
<reviewdate>2006-10-11 21:28:09</reviewdate>
</review>
<review><reviewbody>I&#039;m not a big fan of audience recordings, unless they&#039;re done outside. Inside, there tends to be too much &quot;muffle&quot; and &quot;echo&quot; that creates a muddy-sounding recording. That&#039;s the case with this. The performance is great. The recording is the best that can be got considering the circumstances. I wish Ryan would make soundboards of his shows available via something like livedownloads.com. My hat is tipped to the tapers, but a venue&#039;s acoustics can just wreck the sound of a good show...

Five stars for the performance, but only three stars overall because the muddy sound just makes this not worth the DL, IMHO...</reviewbody>
<reviewtitle>Very nice performance, but somewhat &quot;muddy&quot; recording</reviewtitle>
<stars>3</stars>
<reviewer>Jac from Tucson</reviewer>
<createdate>2006-10-13 02:23:51</createdate>
<reviewdate>2006-10-13 02:23:51</reviewdate>
</review>
<review><reviewbody>Previous comment is a bit harsh on the sound quality.  I would say it is def worth the download.  I am just in awe of you guys getting all this up so quick.  Mind you the naming has gone out of sinc on the mp3 versions.</reviewbody>
<reviewtitle>Sound is OK considering</reviewtitle>
<stars>4</stars>
<reviewer>Don Panik</reviewer>
<createdate>2006-10-13 21:11:27</createdate>
<reviewdate>2006-10-13 21:11:27</reviewdate>
</review>
<review><reviewbody>Plenty of SBDs and other recordings available as torrents at ryanadamsarchive.com

-JG</reviewbody>
<reviewtitle>More RA recordings available</reviewtitle>
<stars>4</stars>
<reviewer>jimgriffin2000</reviewer>
<createdate>2006-10-15 00:38:04</createdate>
<reviewdate>2006-10-15 00:38:04</reviewdate>
</review>
<review><reviewbody>It&#039;s a concert worth gathering. The recording is all right, but there is a mistake naming the tags: Until &quot;To Be Young&quot; every tag is correct, but from then on the fault begins: In fact it is followed by &quot;29&quot;, and every song is tagged with the name of the previous one.
For the correct order you might look at answeringbell.com.
&quot;Turns It Up To Ten&quot; is called &quot;Judy Garland&quot; in most listings.
Nevertheless, fine work!</reviewbody>
<reviewtitle>29!</reviewtitle>
<stars>4</stars>
<reviewer>PeterO</reviewer>
<createdate>2006-10-29 20:43:26</createdate>
<reviewdate>2006-10-29 20:43:26</reviewdate>
</review>
<info><num_reviews>9</num_reviews>
<avg_rating>4.44</avg_rating>
</info>
</reviews>
